Other habits and traditions that continue to this day

The utilisation of animal dung and crop residue as a fertiliser and soil amendment is an ancient practice, dating back to antiquity. In many ancient civilizations, such as ancient Egypt and ancient China, people employed animal dung and crop residue to enhance soil quality and augment crop yields. In ancient Egypt, for instance, people used animal dung as a fertiliser for the soil, deeming it one of the finest natural fertilisers. They also utilized crop residue to improve soil quality and increase crop productivity. In ancient China, people used animal dung and crop residue as a fertiliser and soil amendment, considering it a fundamental fertiliser for enhancing soil quality and augmenting crop yields. In Sudan, the ancient Nubian civilization employed animal dung and crop residue as a fertiliser and soil amendment, regarding it as a natural fertiliser to improve soil quality and increase crop productivity. This ancient practice remains in use today in many parts of the world, where animal dung and crop residue are considered effective natural fertilisers for enhancing soil quality and augmenting crop yields.

The custom of utilising animal dung and crop residue as a fertiliser dates back to the Neolithic era, circa 10,000 years before present. In that epoch, mankind commenced agriculture and employed animal dung to ameliorate soil quality. In ancient Egypt, the utilization of animal dung as a fertiliser was prevalent since approximately 5,000 years before present, during the period of the Old Kingdom (2613-2181 BCE). In ancient China, the employment of animal dung as a fertiliser was widespread since circa 4,000 years before the Common Era, during the era of Shamanic faith (1600-1046 BCE). In Sudan, the ancient Nubian civilization utilized animal dung as a fertiliser since approximately 2,000 years before present, during the reign of the Kingdom of Kush (1070 BCE – 350 CE). This ancient practice has endured unto the present day, wherein animal dung and crop residue are esteemed as efficacious natural fertilisers for enhancing soil quality and augmenting crop yields.

Verily, animal dung and crop residue are employed as a fertiliser in diverse regions of the world, particularly in rural and agricultural areas. In Sudan, for instance, farmers utilise animal dung as a natural fertiliser to enhance soil quality and augment crop yields.

The regions wherein animal dung is utilised as a fertiliser are:

– Rural districts: where beasts are reared and their dung is used as a fertiliser for tillage.

– Agricultural regions: where animal dung is employed to ameliorate soil quality and increase crop productivity.

– Domestic gardens: where people use animal dung as a natural fertiliser to promote plant growth.

The types of animal dung used as a fertiliser are:

– Bovine dung: replete with nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium.

– Galline dung: rich in nitrogen and phosphorus.

– Equine dung: abundant in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium.

– Ovine dung: endowed with nitrogen and phosphorus.

It is advisable to ensure that animal dung has been analysed and cleaned before it is used as fertiliser so that it does not damage plants or soil.

Sudanese Habits and Traditions: The presence of the zir

A so-called zir is a large pottery vessel for storing water and other materials. Local customs and traditions have developed in most parts, if not all, of Sudan, emphasizing the importance of having one or more zirs for storing drinking water. Additionally, the water that seeps out from the bottom of the zir is considered cleaner and is used for drinking by the sick or for making tea for those with a refined taste due to its higher purity.

The zir is well-known to most people, but some, especially the newer generation of Sudanese, particularly city dwellers, may not be familiar with it, as its use has decreased or become rare due to the availability of faster, easier, and more modern alternatives. However, the strongest survives!

The zir has been known in Sudan since ancient times, with evidence found in archaeological excavations – such as the MUAFS excavations between Attab and Ferka and many other missions. It is studied by scholars and is part of ethnographic and folklore studies, as its production is accompanied by stories and legends. It also has various uses in Sudanese customs and cultures, such as in weddings and circumcisions.

Today, we discuss its continuity. During the war in Khartoum, I noticed that the use of the zir had increased. Previously, it had been particularly important in villages, unlike in cities such as Khartoum, where alternative water containers and drinking vessels were available. Altogether, the zir remains the preferred choice in Sudan.

There is a focus on creating a special place for it, whether by building it with green bricks or red bricks, or creating a seat with an iron canopy, known locally as a „Mazira“.

Example of a modern zir.

By chance, I learned a special method for cleaning it, particularly from the green fungi that grow on its exterior due to exposure to air and water seepage, known as „dew“.

Zir vessels before cleaning – note the „dew“ in the lower part.

Firstly, the zir is made by men in the field, but its care and cleaning are the responsibility of women, especially older women.

Despite the various types of zir in terms of size, shape, and color, depending on the materials used, there are also different methods of cleaning and decorating them from one region to another. There is also a preference for using black or red zirs.

In Northern Sudan, both black and red zir are used, but there is a difference in decoration and polishing. The people of the Northern State and the River Nile State prefer to polish and clean the exterior using natural materials, often using red brick for red zir and black charcoal for black zir.

The red brick powder used for zir vessels.

In Dongola and some Nubian regions, people often use red zirs or those with a reddish color, known to specialists, which is determined by the materials used and the firing process. In these regions, the lower part of the zir, which is more prone to green fungi, is painted with a coating, often red or yellow, and has become a distinctive mark of the people of Dongola.

I was fortunate to witness a cleaning process, polishing, and applying a special coating to one of the zir, and I documented the process with photos. The tools and materials used are natural and part of the heritage.

The method of decoration, colouring, and polishing with red brick powder and water.

All of this is done to make the zir look clean and beautiful, and this method is usually used every month or more.

Zir vessels after cleaning.

These are customs, traditions, and tools that are part of the Sudanese heritage, and we hope they will continue for future generations.

Upcoming DiverseNile Seminar: Unravelling Ancient Nubian Beauty

I am delighted to announce the next DiverseNile seminar!

Fatima Siddig, a Sudanese PhD student funded by a DAAD Hilde Domin scholarship and based in Münster, will present her recent research on Nov. 25.

The title of her lecture is: Unravelling Ancient Nubian Beauty: A Multi-Analytical Approach: Chemical and Archaeological Study of Kushite Cosmetics

Fatima is one of a new generation of Sudanese scholars applying interdisciplinary methods to their work, and she is truly the future of Sudanese archaeology. In light of the ongoing war in Sudan, I am both proud and grateful that Fatima is able to conduct her vital research here in Germany. Don’t miss her presentation!

First article by DiverseNile available in Arabic

I am delighted to announce the first translation of a DiverseNile article into Arabic. Our dear friend and colleague, Elhassan Ahmed, translated the recent article entitled ‚Reconstructing Contact Space Biographies‘. You can find the full article here.

To kill two birds with one stone – making important texts more accessible to Arabic-speaking colleagues, but also alleviating the financial hardship of at least some Sudanese colleagues – the Sudan Cultural Emergency and Relief Fund (SCERF) of the International Society for Nubian Studies has launched a translation initiative. All articles translated to date can be found here: https://nubianstudies.org/maqalat/

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the Collegium Aegyptium for their considerable financial support, which has made the translation of our article a reality.

New publication: Establishing a Dialogue

I am very happy to announce that a new article by Panos, Hassan, Julia and myself, on integrating evidence from domestic and funerary archaeology has just been published open-access in World Archaeology (https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2025.2567057). The article is part of a special issue on Domestic and funerary archaeologies in dialogue edited by Penny Bickle (University of York), Solène Denis (CNRS) and Stella Souvatzi (University of Thessaly), and I am very much looking forward to seeing the other papers in the issue.

In our paper ‘Establishing a dialogue – Settlement and funerary archaeology in northern Sudan’ we explore ways of combining methodological and interpretative frameworks from mortuary and settlement archaeology. We focus in particular on better understanding social dynamics and cultural entanglements in the Attab-Ferka region in the 2nd and 3rd millennium BC and how these can manifest in the archaeological record. The nature of cultural entanglements can vary considerably at different scales and spheres of society as well as being influenced by a range of internal and external causes, such as a changing environmental and socio-political landscape. By using both mortuary and domestic archaeological data as well as interdisciplinary approaches which take into account the local landscape, the project is striving for a more holistic perspective on the Attab-Ferka region at both the local scale and regional level in the longue durée

Kerma and Egyptian New Kingdom domestic and mortuary sites in the Attab-Ferka region, inset map highlights various 2-S-43 sites.

In this article we continue to consider the problematic use of labels in archaeological research, for example ‘Egyptian’ versus ‘Nubian’ by suggesting that ‘compound’ (after Stewart 2011) cultures may be a useful way of thinking about the ‘new’ cultures that can be created when different communities interact. This broadly moves away from some of the problematic connotations or idiosyncrasies of existing terminologies such as hybrid or syncretism. Overall, we hope this new article gives a good overview of many of the areas we are exploring as part of the DiverseNile project, and we will be elaborating on many of them in upcoming publications (including cultural entanglement; settlement patterns/urbanism; scales of analysis).

Reference

Stewart, C. 2011. “Creolization, Hybridity, Syncretism, Mixture.” Portuguese Studies 27 (1): 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/port.2011.0007